Insights
Blog
This is the fourth and final installment of a four-part series on technology assisted review (TAR). This article compares TAR with exhaustive manual review— review performed solely by human beings with knowledge of the subject matter.
This is the third installment of a four-part series on technology assisted review (TAR). This article compares TAR with exhaustive manual review— review performed solely by human beings with knowledge of the subject matter.
Join DisputeSoft Managing Director Andrew Schulman for a live webcast on April 29 to learn about the important role that source code plays in intellectual property cases.
News
On April 10, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware’s judgment the patent dispute matter of WhitServe LLC v. Donuts Inc.
On May 26, 2020, a judge in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia ordered Capital One to release its incident report produced by cybersecurity firm Mandiant in the wake of Capital One’s March 2019 data breach that exposed the personal information of approximately 106 million people in the U.S. and Canada.
On May 20, 2020, a judge in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit vacated the District Court for the Southern District of Florida’s decision in the matter of Compulife Software Inc. v. Newman et al, remanding the case for new findings of fact.