Will the Supreme Court save us from software patents?

    Jeff Parmet

    If you write a book or a song, you can get copyright protection for it. If you invent a new pill or a better mousetrap, you can get a patent on it. But for the last two decades, software has had the distinction of being potentially eligible for both copyright and patent protection.

    Critics say that’s a mistake. They argue that the complex and expensive patent system is a terrible fit for the fast-moving software industry. And they argue that patent protection is unnecessary because software innovators already have copyright protection available.

    This spring, the Supreme Court will weigh in on the patentability of software for the first time in a generation. In the 1970s, the high court placed strict rules on software-related patents. But since then, a lower court has effectively overruled the Supreme Court’s precedents, allowing hundreds of thousands of legally dubious software patents to be approved.

    Read more at the Washington Post

    Need a Software Patent Infringement expert?

    If you are in need of an expert with experience in software patent disputes, we invite you to consider DisputeSoft.